![]() We're cloud-first as a business organization, so if there was something that they could do better, it would be to provide that SaaS-based solution. ![]() ![]() We're certainly having a really good conversation with people at GitLab right now around that very thing, around software as a service, rather than having to build our own platforms and the whole management around that. If they could do a software-as-a-service product, we'd probably take it, if it was something that could scale and integrate into our pipeline. If you run it through your own infrastructure that's the only additional cost. But in terms of the price point that we're charged, I know the people who actually sign the checks for this and they're happy to pay - if anybody's ever happy to pay for anything at that particular level. I don't know whether we get a great deal or a bad deal compared to other companies. Going back to the scalability, when we had anonymous connections in there, we probably were running at about 5,000 and there were no issues. We have plugged those anonymous gaps now, so we're okay. We discovered this by chance when we were going through the whole licensing situation last year. We had to do some work to get over the fact that any anonymous interactions with the Repository product had to be put back to an end-user account. According to the letter of the contract, an anonymous request consumes a license. One of the challenges we had around licensing was how to deal with anonymous requests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |